365体育官方

      <meter id="jeurm"><ins id="jeurm"></ins></meter>

      <meter id="jeurm"><ins id="jeurm"><rp id="jeurm"></rp></ins></meter><output id="jeurm"><video id="jeurm"></video></output>

      1. <label id="jeurm"></label>
            <meter id="jeurm"></meter>
          1. <output id="jeurm"><video id="jeurm"><optgroup id="jeurm"></optgroup></video></output>

            <label id="jeurm"><tr id="jeurm"></tr></label><meter id="jeurm"><ins id="jeurm"></ins></meter>
              1. Gold Mining Process Development

                 

                THE BASIC PROCESSES OF GOLD RECOVERY

                INTRODUCTION

                Man has held a fascination with recovering and acquiring gold almost since
                the beginning of time. This paper will attempt to put the multitude of recovery
                processes into a current day perspective.

                An underlying theme of this paper is that the mineralogy of the ore will
                determine the best recovery process and that metallurgical testing is almost
                always required to optimize a recovery flowsheet.

                The major categories of commercially viable recovery processes include the
                following:

                1. Gravity separation
                2. Flotation
                3. Cyanidation
                4. Refractory ore processing
                5. Alternative lixiviants
                6. Amalgamation

                Cyanidation processes may include the following operations:

                1. Agitated tank leaching
                2. Heap leaching
                3. Carbon adsorption recovery
                4. Zinc precipitation recovery

                Carbon adsorption recovery may include the following alternatives:

                1. Carbon-In-Pulp (CIP)
                2. Carbon-In-Leach (CIL)
                3. Carbon-In-Column (CIC)

                Refractory ore processing methods almost always serve only one purpose, to
                treat ores that will not liberate their values by conventional cyanide leaching.
                The refractory ore treatment process is then followed by a conventional
                cyanidation step. Refractory ore processing methods include:

                1. Bioleaching
                2. Autoclaving (pressure oxidation)
                3. Roasting
                4. Clorination
                5. Pre-oxidation
                6. Lime/caustic pretreatment

                Today, cyanide leaching is the method of choice for the recovery of most
                of the world’s gold production. There are however, many other chemical
                leaching processes that have been sporadically or historically used. In most
                instances, cyanide leaching will provide a more technologically effective
                and cost efficient method. Alternative lixiviants include:

                1. Bromides (Acid and Alkaline)
                2. Chlorides
                3. Thiourrea
                4. Thiosulfate

                Amalgamation is one of the oldest processes available. It relies upon the
                contact of ore with mercury to form a gold-mercury amalgam. This process
                is strongly out of favor with the major mining companies, due to the extremely
                toxic nature of mercury and the processes inferior performance when compared
                to the available alternatives. The process is still used extensively by artesian
                mines in third world countries and at small “mom and pop” mines, due to its
                simplicity.

                Note:
                This paper is just now being written, and sections will be added to our web
                page as they are composed. Please check back later for more information.
                Your comments are welcomed!

                GRAVITY CONCENTRATION

                Gravity concentration processes rely on the principal that gold contained
                within an ore body is higher in specific gravity than the host rocks that
                contain the gold. Elemental gold has a specific gravity of 19.3, and typical
                ore has a specific gravity of about 2.6. All gravity concentration devices
                create movement between the gold and host rock particles in a manner to separate
                the heavy pieces from the lighter pieces of material.

                The prospector’s gold pan is the most familiar gravity concentration
                device. To function properly, the ore must be broken down to particles small
                enough to provide a significant specific gravity difference among the particles.

                Placer mining has generally been where gravity concentrates have been most
                widely applied. In a placer deposit, there has generally been a pre-concentration
                of gold made naturally by gravity concentration due to ore particles being
                transported by water. Mechanical concentration is used to continue the process
                until sufficient concentration is obtained.

                Gravity concentration works when gold is in a free elemental state in particles
                large enough to allow mechanical concentration to occur.

                The number of types of gravity concentration devised that have been used
                is almost limitless. Some of the more popular ones are:

                1. Sluice boxes
                2. Rocker boxes
                3. Jigs
                4. Spirals
                5. Shaking tables
                6. Centrifugal concentrators
                7. Dry washers

                In addition to specific gravity differences, the performance of gravity
                concentration is also affected by particle shape, as can be imagined by comparing
                a falling leaf to a twig falling in air.

                The performance of the various categories of gravity separators are as generally
                depicted on the following illustration.

                The process flowsheet generally consists of conditioning and sizing of the
                feed material followed by ore or two stages of recovery.

                FLOTATION

                The flotation process consists of producing a mineral concentrate through
                the use of chemical conditioning agents followed by intense agitation and
                air sparging of the agitated ore slurry to produce a mineral rich foam
                concentrate. The process is said to have been invented by a miner who watched
                the process happening while washing dirty work clothing in his home washing
                machine.

                Specific chemicals are added to either float (foam off) specific minerals
                or to depress the flotation of other minerals. Several stages of processing
                are generally involved with rough bulk flotation products being subjected
                to additional flotation steps to increase product purity.

                The flotation process in general does not float free gold particles but is
                particularly effective when gold is associated with sulfide minerals such
                as pyrites. In a typical pyrytic gold ore, the gold is encapsulated within
                an iron sulfide crystal structure. Highly oxidized ores generally do not
                respond well to flotation.

                Advantages of the flotation process are that gold values are generally liberated
                at a fairly coarse particle size (28 mesh) which means that ore grinding
                costs are minimized. The reagents used for flotation are generally not toxic,
                which means that tailings disposal costs are low.

                Flotation will frequently be used when gold is recovered in conjunction with
                other metals such as copper, lead, or zinc. Flotation concentrates are usually
                sent to an off-site smelting facility for recovery of gold and base metals.

                Cyanide leaching is frequently used in conjunction with flotation. Cyanidation
                of flotation concentrates or flotation tailings is done depending upon the
                specific mineralogy and flowsheet economics.

                CYANIDATION

                Cyanide leaching is the standard method used for recovering most of the gold
                throughout the world today. The process originated around 1890 and quickly
                replaced all competing technologies. The reason was strictly economical in
                nature. Where amalgamation plants could recover about 60% of the gold present,
                cyanide could recover about 90%. Because of the improved recovery, many of
                the old tailings piles from other processes have been economically reprocessed
                by cyanide leaching. Cyanide is as close to a “universal solvent” for gold
                as has been developed. Other leaching reagents will only work on very specific
                types of ore.

                The standard cyanide leach process consists of grinding the ore to about
                80% – 200 mesh, mixing the ore/water grinding slurry with about 2 pounds
                per ton of sodium cyanide and enough quick lime to keep the pH of the solution
                at about 11.0. At a slurry concentration of 50% solids, the slurry passes
                through a series of agitated mixing tanks with a residence time of 24 hours.
                The gold bearing liquid is then separated from the leached solids in thickener
                tanks or vacuum filters, and the tailings are washed to remove gold and cyanide
                prior to disposal. The separation and washing take place in a series of units
                by a process referred to as counter current decantation (CCD). Gold is then
                recovered from the pregnant solution by zinc precipitation and the solution
                is recycled for reuse in leaching and grinding.

                REFRACTORY ORE PROCESSING

                The common definition of “refractory” gold ores, are those ores that do not
                allow the recovery of gold by standard gravity concentration or direct cyanide
                leaching.

                One major category of refractory ores are gold values contained within the
                crystalline structure of sulfide minerals such as pyrite and arsenopyrite.
                For cyanide to leach gold, the cyanide solution must come into direct contact
                with gold molecules. With many sulfide ores, the ore cannot practically be
                ground down fine enough to expose the gold particles. The objective of
                pretreatment for these ores is to remove enough of the sulfide so that at
                least a small portion of all gold particles are directly exposed to the elements.
                Processes available for treatment all involve oxidation of sulfur to form
                water soluble sulfates or sulfur dioxide. The main sulfur oxidation processes
                include:

                1. Bio-oxidation: Bio-oxidation uses sulfur consuming bacteria in a water solution
                  to remove sulfur.
                2. Pressure oxidation: Utilizes oxygen and heat under pressure in a liquid medium,
                  to effect oxidation of sulfur by way of a controlled chemical reaction. High
                  pressure autoclaves are used for the reactors. Reactor operation is under
                  alkaline or acidic conditions, depending upon the specific process.
                3. Roasting: Roasting uses heat and air to burn away the sulfur from dry ore.
                  Roasting was the standard method for sulfur oxidation years ago when it was
                  considered environmentally acceptable to emit large quantities of sulfur
                  dioxide gas into the atmosphere. Today’s roasting plants employ elaborate
                  gas scrubbing systems that frequently produce sulfuric acid as a byproduct.
                4. Chemical oxidation using nitric acid at ambient pressure and temperature
                  has also been used on a limited basis.

                Other ore types considered refractory include:

                1. Carbonaceous ores that allow cyanide to dissolve gold but quickly adsorb
                  gold back onto the active carbon in the ore. Treatment processes include
                  chlorination for carbon deactivation, roasting to burn away carbon and
                  carbon-in-leach which introduces competing high activity carbon to preferentially
                  adsorb gold that can be conveniently separated from the leach slurry.
                2. Copper/gold ores that require uneconomically high quantities of cyanide to
                  process due to the solubility of copper in cyanide.
                3. A multitude of other unfavorable constituents including pyrrhotite, tellurides,
                  antimony, and arsenic.

                It should be noted that most of the refractory ore treatment processes are
                expensive and frequently economical only with higher grade ores and high
                processing rates.

                HEAP LEACHING

                Heap leaching was introduced in the 1970’s as a means to drastically
                reduce gold recovery costs. This process has literally made many mines by
                taking low grade geological resources and transforming them to the proven
                ore category. Ore grades as low as 0.01 oz Au per ton have been economically
                processed by heap leaching.

                Heap leaching involves placing crushed or run of mine ore in a pile built
                upon an impervious liner. Cyanide solution is distributed across the top
                of the pile and the solution percolates down through the pile and leaches
                out the gold. The gold laden pregnant solution drains out from the bottom
                of the pile and is collected for gold recovery by either carbon adsorption
                or zinc precipitation. The barren solution is then recycled to the pile.

                Heap leaching generally requires 60 to 90 days for processing ore that could
                be leached in 24 hours in a conventional agitated leach process. Gold recovery
                is typically 70% as compared with 90% in an agitated leach plant. Even with
                this inferior performance, the process has found wide favor, due to the vastly
                reduced processing costs compared with agitated leaching.

                The cost advantage areas are largely as follows:

                1. Comminution: Where as heap leaching is typically done on –3/4 inch rock,
                  agitated leaching requires reduction to –200 mesh. This additional step
                  is typically done with large grinding mills that consume roughly one horsepower
                  per ton per day of capacity.
                2. Solids liquid separation steps are not required for heap leaching.
                3. Tailings disposal costs are quite high for a modern agitated leach plant.
                  Large expensive liquid containment dams are required. By comparison, heap
                  leach pads can generally be left in place after reclamation.

                Disadvantages, in addition to lower recovery of heap leaching compared with
                agitated leaching, include:

                1. The stacked ore must be porous enough to allow solution to trickle through
                  it. There have been many recovery failures due to the inability to obtain
                  solution flow. This is widely experienced when ores have a high clay content.
                  This problem is often alleviated by agglomeration prior to heap stacking.
                2. In areas of high rainfall, solution balance problems can arise, resulting
                  in the need to treat and discharge process water.
                3. In extremely cold areas, heap freezing can result in periods of low recovery.
                  Operational procedure modifications such as subsurface solution application
                  have reduced, but not eliminated, this concern.
                4. Ice and snow melting can result in excessive accumulation of leach solutions.
                  This concern can often be mitigated by use of diversion structures.

                Quite frequently, mines will use agitated leaching for high grade ore and
                heap leaching for marginal grade ores that otherwise would be considered
                waste rock. A common recovery plant is often employed for both operations.

                MERRILL-CROWE RECOVERY

                The traditional method for gold recovery from pregnant cyanide solutions
                is zinc precipitation. Originally, solutions were passed through boxes containing
                zinc metal shavings. Gold and silver would precipitate out of solution by
                a simple replacement reaction procedure. Around 1920, zinc shaving precipitation
                was replaced by the Merrill-Crowe method of zinc precipitation.

                The Merrill-Crowe process starts with the filtration of pregnant solution
                in media filters. Filter types used include pressure leaf filters, filter
                presses, and vacuum leaf filters. Generally, a precoat of diatomaceous earth
                is used to produce a sparkling clear solution.

                Clarified solution is then passed through a vacuum deaeration tower where
                oxygen is removed from the solution.

                Zinc powder is then added to the solution with a dry chemical feeder and
                a zinc emulsification cone. The reaction of the special fine powder zinc
                with the solution is almost instantaneous.

                Precipitated gold is then typically recovered in a recessed plate or plate
                and frame filter press.

                CARBON ADSORPTION RECOVERY

                Granular coconut shell activated carbon, is widely used for recovery of gold
                from cyanide solutions. The process can be applied to clean solutions through
                fluidized bed adsorption columns, or directly to leached ore slurries by
                the addition of carbon to agitated slurry tanks, followed by separation of
                the carbon from the slurry by coarse screening methods.

                Gold cyanide is adsorbed into the pores of activated carbon, resulting in
                a process solution that is devoid of gold. The loaded carbon is heated by
                a strong solution of hot caustic and cyanide to reverse the adsorption process
                and strip the carbon of gold. Gold is then removed from the solution by
                electrowinning. Stripped carbon is returned to adsorption for reuse.

                The major advantage of carbon-in-pulp recovery over Merrill Crowe recovery
                is the elimination of the leached ore solids and liquid separation unit
                operation. The separation step typically involves a series of expensive gravity
                separation thickeners or continuous filters arranged for countercurrent washing
                or filtration of the solids. For ores exhibiting slow settling or filtration
                rates, such as ores with high clay content, the countercurrent decantation
                (CCD) step can become cost prohibitive.

                Ores with high silver content will generally suggest that Merrill-Crowe recovery
                be used. This is because of the very large carbon stripping and electrowinning
                systems required for processing large quantities of silver. The typical rule
                of thumb states that economic silver to gold ratios of greater than 4 to
                1, will favor installation of a Merrill-Crowe system, but this decision can
                be altered if the ore exhibits very slow settling rates.

                There are several variations to the carbon adsorption process including:

                1. Carbon-In-Column (CIC): With carbon-in-column operation, solution flows
                through a series of fluidized bed columns in an upflow direction. Columns
                are most frequently open topped, but closed top pressurized columns are
                occasionally used.

                Carbon columns are most commonly used to recover gold and silver from heap
                leach solutions. The major advantage of fluidized bed carbon columns is their
                ability to process solutions that contain as much as 2 to 3 wt% solids. Heap
                leach solutions are frequently high in solids due to fine particle washing
                from heaps. Down flow carbon columns are rarely used for gold recovery, because
                they act like sand filters and are subsequently subject to frequent plugging.

                2. Carbon-In-Pulp (CIP): Carbon-in-pulp operation is a variation of the
                conventional cyanidation process. Ore is crushed, finely ground, and cyanide
                leached in a series of agitated tanks to solubilize the gold values. Instead
                of separating solids from the pregnant solution, as in the traditional
                cyanidation process, granular activated carbon is added to the leached slurry.

                The carbon adsorbs the gold from the slurry solution and is removed from
                the slurry by coarse screening. In practice, this is accomplished by a series
                of five or six agitated tanks where carbon and ore slurry are contacted in
                a staged countercurrent manner.

                This greatly increases the possible gold loading onto the carbon while
                maintaining a high recovery percentage. Carbon is retained within the individual
                CIP tanks by CIP tank screens. The opening size of the CIP tank screens is
                such that the finely ground ore particles will pass through the screens,
                but the coarse carbon will not. Almost every imaginable type of screen has
                been tried for this application, with some types being much more successful
                than the rest.

                3. Carbon-In-Leach (CIL): The carbon-in-leach process integrates leaching
                and carbon-in-pulp into a single unit process operation. Leach tanks are
                fitted with carbon retention screens and the CIP tanks are eliminated. Carbon
                is added in leach so that the gold is adsorbed onto carbon almost as soon
                as it is dissolved by the cyanide solution. The CIL process is frequently
                used when native carbon is present in the gold ore. This native carbon will
                adsorb the leached gold and prevent its recovery. This phenomenon is referred
                to commonly as “preg-robbing”. The carbon added in CIL is more active than
                native carbon, so the gold will be preferentially adsorbed by carbon that
                can be recovered for stripping. The CIL process will frequently be used in
                small cyanide mills to reduce the complexity and cost of the circuit.

                There are several disadvantages to CIL compared with CIP. Carbon loading
                will be 20 to 30% less than with CIP, which means more carbon has to be stripped.
                (This disadvantage may be overcome by a hybrid circuit, incorporating a cross
                between CIL and CIP.) The CIL process requires a larger carbon inventory
                in the circuit, which results in a larger in-process tie up of gold. The
                larger carbon inventory can also result in higher carbon (and gold) losses
                through carbon attrition.

                CONCLUSION

                Denver Mineral Engineers has had extensive experience with all of the
                commercially viable gold and silver recovery mining processes. We can suggest
                the optimal process and equipment for virtually any ore. Although we are
                not a testing laboratory, we can design and coordinate your testing program.
                If we don’t have the answers, our network of industry experts can be utilized.

                We are not research metallurgists and we will not try to make a career out
                of investigating your ore. The emphasis of our company is to build process
                systems that produce profits for our clients.


                Fast & Associates, LLC

                Denver Mineral Engineers, Inc.
                10641 Flatiron Rd.
                Littleton, CO 80124 USA
                sales@denvermineral.com

                 Posted by at 2:46 pm

                  <meter id="jeurm"><ins id="jeurm"></ins></meter>

                  <meter id="jeurm"><ins id="jeurm"><rp id="jeurm"></rp></ins></meter><output id="jeurm"><video id="jeurm"></video></output>

                  1. <label id="jeurm"></label>
                        <meter id="jeurm"></meter>
                      1. <output id="jeurm"><video id="jeurm"><optgroup id="jeurm"></optgroup></video></output>

                        <label id="jeurm"><tr id="jeurm"></tr></label><meter id="jeurm"><ins id="jeurm"></ins></meter>
                          1. Super League

                            news

                            Super League

                            city

                            Application Essentials

                            education

                            Celebrity

                            Real estate

                            Super League